Only editor-reviewed claims are shown. Approximate request location identifies the source, not a verified residence.
Supported5
False8
Likely False3
Misleading7
Unresolved0
MisleadingAnonymous Visitor / Antarctica
Robert Kraft married in 2022, is mentioned in the Epstein files, and Ed Sheeran performed at his wedding.
About
Public figure · Robert Kraft
Attribution
Robert Kraft was married in 2022 and Ed Sheeran did perform at Kraft’s wedding, but the “mentioned in the Epstein files” part is context-dependent and potentially overstates what the released records show. The most recent DOJ-released material described by the Boston Globe says Epstein told his lawyer he wanted Kraft to hire him, and that the newly released documents contained no direct communication between Kraft and Epstein. The DOJ’s 2026 Section 3 report also lists many names from Epstein-related materials, but that list alone does not establish the same level of connection implied by the claim.
Assessment
The marriage and wedding-performance parts are supported by contemporaneous reporting: Kraft married Dana Blumberg in October 2022, and Ed Sheeran said he sang “Perfect” at the wedding reception. The Epstein-files portion is more nuanced. DOJ-released records reported in February 2026 mention Kraft in an email chain where Epstein discussed Kraft’s prostitution case and wanted to refer a lawyer, but the Boston Globe explicitly notes there was no direct communication between Kraft and Epstein in the newly released documents. So the claim bundles a true biographical fact, a true event, and a potentially misleading implication of a stronger Epstein connection than the primary-source evidence supports.
NASA public mission materials and history pages state that Apollo 11 landed on the Moon on July 20, 1969.
Assessment
The claim matches NASA’s official mission overview and lunar landing site pages, which explicitly say Apollo 11 landed on July 20, 1969. Multiple NASA history sources also record the lunar module landing on that date and describe it as the first crewed lunar landing.
Iceland needs to join the EU to avoid being taken over by Trump, Putin, or Xi.
About
Public event · Iceland EU Accession Negotiation Referrendum
Attribution
The claim is a political argument about Iceland’s motives and geopolitical risk, not a literal factual statement about an event. The underlying factual elements are that Iceland is not currently an EU member, it has a referendum scheduled for 29 August 2026 on whether to resume accession talks, and its security currently rests primarily on NATO and a bilateral U.S. defense agreement rather than EU membership. Those facts do not support the sweeping assertion that joining the EU is needed to avoid being ‘taken over’ by Trump, Putin, or Xi.
Assessment
Iceland’s EU question is real and current: the government proposed a referendum on resuming accession talks on 29 August 2026, and official EU/Iceland sources confirm accession negotiations were put on hold in 2013 and that Iceland’s current security architecture is centered on NATO plus the 1951 U.S.-Iceland defense agreement. But the claim goes well beyond available evidence by asserting a specific preventative necessity against three named foreign leaders. That is speculative and rhetorical, not established fact. At most, the evidence supports that some Icelanders and officials see EU membership as one way to diversify Iceland’s external alignment amid concerns about the U.S. and broader Arctic security; it does not show that Iceland would otherwise be ‘taken over’ by Trump, Putin, or Xi.
Donald Trump will take over Iceland after taking over Greenland.
About
Public figure · Donald Trump
Attribution
Donald Trump
Assessment
The claim says Trump will take over Iceland after taking over Greenland. The evidence supports that Trump has discussed taking over Greenland in various ways, but I found no credible evidence that he has said, planned, or is positioned to take over Iceland. Recent reporting also notes that Trump’s Greenland remarks have been confused with Iceland in some contexts, but that is about a slip of the tongue or public concern, not an actual Iceland takeover plan. Because the Iceland part is unsupported and contradicted by the available record of public statements and coverage, the overall claim is false.
Aircraft condensation trails consist of chemical or biological agents.
About
Public event · Contrails from aircraft
Attribution
Claim about aircraft contrails
Assessment
The claim is contradicted by multiple authoritative sources. FAA, NASA, and NOAA all describe contrails as ice clouds/ice crystals formed from aircraft engine exhaust water vapor condensing and freezing, with no evidence that contrails are chemical or biological agents. The FAA also states jet fuel does not contain metal-based compounds and that contrails pose no direct threat to public health. While aircraft exhaust can include small amounts of combustion products such as soot and NOx, those sources do not support the claim that contrails themselves consist of chemical or biological agents.
The United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack deleted and destroyed all the evidence.
About
Public event · Jan 6th Insurrection
Attribution
The claim is that the House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack deleted and destroyed all the evidence.
Assessment
Available public records and independent fact checks directly contradict the claim that the committee deleted and destroyed all evidence. The committee’s final report and supporting materials were published through government channels, and multiple sources note that committee evidence remained publicly available or was transferred to House/NARA recordkeeping systems. A House Administration subcommittee later alleged some records were deleted or missing, but that is materially different from 'all the evidence' being destroyed. The strongest evidence supports that some records-handling disputes existed, not total destruction.
Mama Cass Elliot of the Mamas and the Papas died from asphyxiation related to eating a club sandwich.
About
Public figure · Mama Cash
Attribution
The claim attributes Mama Cass Elliot’s death to asphyxiation from eating a club sandwich. The well-documented story is a false rumor; she was not shown to have died from choking on a sandwich, and reporting on her autopsy indicates a heart attack/cardiac cause rather than asphyxiation. The sandwich detail is the misleading part, while the underlying death itself is not disputed.
Assessment
The proposition is materially misleading because it repeats the long-running “ham sandwich” rumor in altered form (“club sandwich” / “asphyxiation”). Available reference material states that the rumor is false and that the autopsy found a heart attack, not choking/asphyxiation. The claim conflates a debunked anecdote with the actual cause of death.
The Trump administration is not releasing all Epstein files that were available.
About
Public figure · Jeoffrey Epstein
Attribution
The claim is about the Trump administration’s handling of Epstein files. Public DOJ/FBI materials show the administration released some Epstein-related files, but also stated in July 2025 that no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted, and the DOJ’s Epstein page says it contains only releasable documents and will be updated if additional documents are identified for release. That supports the assertion that not all available files were being released. However, the exact scope of what was “available” is not fully defined in the claim.
Assessment
The core factual proposition is supported by official records. In February 2025, DOJ said it had declassified and publicly released a first phase of Epstein files and intended to release remaining documents after review/redaction. In July 2025, DOJ/FBI stated they had examined evidence in the government’s possession and determined no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted. The current DOJ Epstein page is explicitly limited to releasable documents and says it will be updated if additional documents are identified. Together, these sources support the claim that the administration was not releasing all Epstein files that were available, at least as to records in government possession that were deemed releasable.
Clinical studies have shown that magic mushrooms help treat depression.
About
Public event · Magic mushrooms
Attribution
The claim is supported as a general statement about clinical research on psilocybin (the active compound in some magic mushrooms), though it should be understood as preliminary and not equivalent to an approved treatment.
Assessment
Multiple clinical trials in major depression and treatment-resistant depression have reported symptom improvements with psilocybin-assisted therapy, and recent systematic reviews/meta-analyses conclude there is clinical evidence of antidepressant effects. For example, a randomized clinical trial in 2022 found psilocybin with psychological support improved depression severity, and earlier randomized trials reported similar short-term benefits. More recent reviews also synthesize these trials and support efficacy signals, while emphasizing small samples, short follow-up, and the need for further research. The claim is broadly accurate if interpreted as 'studies have shown potential benefit,' but it would be misleading if read to imply psilocybin is an established, approved depression treatment.
The European Union is Israel’s biggest trading partner and has been supporting Israel’s invasion of Gaza by continuing to supply arms.
About
Public place · The European Union
Attribution
The claim attributes two separate propositions to the European Union: that the EU is Israel’s biggest trading partner, and that the EU has been supporting Israel’s invasion of Gaza by continuing to supply arms. Official EU trade data support the first proposition, but the second is misleading because arms-export decisions are made by member states under national controls, and the record does not establish that the EU itself is supplying arms to Israel.
Assessment
The first part is supported: the European Commission says the EU is Israel’s biggest trading partner, and in 2025 it accounted for 31.7% of Israel’s total goods trade. The second part is not supported as stated. EU institutions repeatedly note that arms export control is handled by member states under EU/common-position rules, and parliamentary materials show criticism that some member states continue arms transfers to Israel; however, that is not the same as the EU as a bloc supplying arms. The claim therefore overstates the EU’s direct role and collapses member-state exports into an EU-level action.
Russia invaded Ukraine to eliminate a Nazi regime.
About
Public place · Ukraine
Attribution
The claim attributes to Russia a justification that was publicly stated by Vladimir Putin—“demilitarisation and denazification” of Ukraine—but presents that justification as an established fact. Public records show Russia’s invasion was widely condemned by the UN as a violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, while Putin’s “denazification” framing was part of Russia’s stated rationale rather than an accepted basis for the invasion. The claim is therefore materially incomplete and context-distorting.
Assessment
Russia did publicly say its goals for the Feb. 24, 2022 invasion included “denazification” of Ukraine and protection from alleged neo-Nazis. However, UN resolutions and Secretary-General statements characterize the invasion as an illegal use of force and a violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. The core problem with the claim is not that Russia mentioned Nazis, but that it asserts the invasion was to eliminate a Nazi regime as if that were an established factual reason; the evidence supports that this was Russia’s justification/pretext, not a verified basis.
Donald Trump will be able to run in the 2028 election if a war is happening.
About
Public figure · Donald Trump
Attribution
Donald Trump
Assessment
The claim is false. The Constitution’s Twenty-Second Amendment says no person may be elected president more than twice, and there is no war exception in that amendment. Article II lists the basic eligibility requirements for president, but it does not create a wartime override to the two-term limit. So even if a war were happening, that would not by itself make Trump eligible to run for president in 2028 if he has already been elected twice. ([constitution.congress.gov](https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-22/?utm_source=openai))
Stonehenge was built by ancient druids who performed occult rituals there.
About
Public place · Stonehenge
Attribution
Stonehenge
Assessment
The claim is materially misleading. English Heritage states that Stonehenge was built by Neolithic and Bronze Age people around 2500 BC (with the first major enclosure around 3000 BC), and that Druids were a much later Iron Age group; it explicitly says Stonehenge was wrongly portrayed for centuries as built by Druids. English Heritage also notes that spirituality and ritual were likely important at Stonehenge, but that is not the same as saying ancient druids built it or that the monument is evidenced as an occult ritual site. The best-supported correction is that Stonehenge predates Druids by at least a millennium and was built by prehistoric Britons, not ancient Druids. ([english-heritage.org.uk](https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/places/stonehenge/history-and-stories/understanding-stonehenge/?utm_source=openai))
Urban Myth: The submission supplies no public speaker or institutional source; it states a widely repeated folklore-like claim that carrots improve eyesight.
Assessment
Carrots contain beta-carotene, which the body can convert to vitamin A, a nutrient required for normal vision. In people whose vision is impaired by vitamin A deficiency, restoring adequate vitamin A intake can improve deficiency-related problems such as night blindness. But eating extra carrots does not sharpen already-normal eyesight or correct other causes of poor vision. The unqualified claim is therefore misleading because it omits the decisive deficiency condition and turns support for normal eye function into a general promise of better eyesight.
After decapitation, the head may remain biologically active for a short time, possibly seconds or minutes.
About
Public event · The human body
Attribution
The claim is attributed to general human biology/physiology, not a specific person or event.
Assessment
The proposition is broadly supported: after decapitation, neural or brain electrical activity can persist briefly. Multiple animal studies and reviews report EEG or cortical activity lasting roughly seconds, with some sources noting activity up to about 15–30 seconds and others describing even longer post-decapitation brain phenomena in experimental contexts. However, the exact duration in humans is not directly established here; the strongest evidence is from animal studies and historical/medical reviews, so the claim is best understood as a cautious generalization rather than a human-specific certainty.
Marie Antoinette said “Let them eat cake” in response to reports that the public were starving in the street.
About
Public place · Marie Antoinette
Attribution
Urban Myth — a widely repeated story attributed to Marie Antoinette, with no public speaker or institutional source supplied in the submission.
Assessment
The normalized claim is that Marie Antoinette personally answered news of hungry people by saying “Let them eat cake.” Strong historical evidence weighs against that attribution. Rousseau recorded the same anecdote about an unnamed “great princess”; Marie Antoinette did not arrive at Versailles until 1770, and historians report no contemporary evidence tying the saying to her, with the attribution appearing only decades after her death. The older wording referred to brioche rather than modern cake. Because the surviving record cannot conclusively exclude an undocumented independent utterance, the responsible verdict is Likely False rather than False.
A country that joins the EU must comply with the EU’s common trade policy and foreign policy.
About
Public event · The effects of joining EU on foreign policy and trade policies
Attribution
European Union accession rules — treaty-based membership obligations, checked 14 August 2026.
Assessment
The core proposition is supported when "foreign policy" means the EU treaty-defined Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). Candidate countries must adopt the EU acquis before accession. The common commercial policy is an exclusive Union competence, so member states may act there only when empowered by the EU or when implementing Union acts. For CFSP, Article 24 of the Treaty on European Union requires member states to support the Union external and security policy actively and unreservedly and comply with Union action; Article 29 requires national policies to conform to adopted Union positions. This does not mean EU institutions independently replace every national foreign-policy choice: CFSP uses special procedures and most decisions require all member states to agree. Members help form the common policy, but must align with it once Union actions or positions are adopted.
The 1969 moon landing was a staged hoax filmed in a studio.
About
Public event · The Moon Landing in 1969
Attribution
Conspiracy Theory — The submission alleges that NASA and others secretly staged the July 20, 1969 Apollo 11 lunar landing in a studio; it supplied no specific speaker or institutional source.
Assessment
The normalized core proposition is that Apollo 11 did not land on the Moon and its landing record was produced in a studio. That proposition is false. Later Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter images show the Eagle descent stage at Tranquility Base. The University of Manchester records that Jodrell Bank independently tracked Eagle during its lunar descent while also tracking the Soviet Luna 15 mission. Apollo 11 returned 21.6 kilograms of catalogued lunar rock and soil, and the laser retroreflector deployed at the site has supported continuing ranging observations from Earth. These independent observations and physical records directly contradict a staged-studio hoax. The Conspiracy Theory label describes the allegation type, not the verdict.
Washington / United States · approximate request location
FalseWashington / United States
Childhood vaccinations cause autism later in life.
About
Public figure · Robert Kennedy Jr.
Attribution
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — The submission targets Kennedy’s long-running public advocacy linking childhood vaccination and autism. At the August 10, 2026 White House vaccine-order event, the Associated Press reported that Kennedy and President Donald Trump suggested childhood vaccines may cause autism. This draft assesses the underlying causal allegation, not merely whether Kennedy voiced it.
Assessment
The normalized core proposition is that routine childhood vaccinations cause autism after vaccination. It is false. The World Health Organization’s Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety reviewed 31 primary studies published from 2010 through August 2025 and found no causal link between vaccines and autism spectrum disorder. A nationwide Danish cohort of 657,461 children found that MMR vaccination did not increase autism risk, including in susceptible subgroups or during periods after vaccination. WHO’s broader evidence review also considered childhood vaccines, thimerosal and aluminum adjuvants. The Associated Press independently checked the claim in the August 2026 public context and reported that decades of studies consistently find no link. Autism may be diagnosed after vaccines are given, but temporal sequence is not evidence of causation. Some vaccine-specific questions have less complete evidence than MMR or thimerosal; that limitation does not establish the broad causal claim and does not outweigh the comprehensive evidence directly against it.
Washington / United States · approximate request location
FalseWashington / United States
The claim says QAnon alleges that Donald Trump is opposing a shadowy group of Democratic pedophiles based in a pizzeria basement in Washington.
About
Public figure · Donald Trump
Attribution
Conspiracy Theory — unattributed visitor claim concerning the QAnon and Pizzagate conspiracy narrative.
Assessment
The submission accurately describes a conspiracy claim associated with QAnon: that Donald Trump is fighting a Democratic child-sex-trafficking cabal headquartered in a Washington pizzeria basement. That descriptive point is context, not the proposition receiving the verdict. The fact-check applies to the underlying allegation itself, which is false. No such trafficking operation existed at the pizzeria. The basement allegation originated with the earlier Pizzagate conspiracy theory and was later absorbed or amplified by QAnon. The U.S. Justice Department described the rumors that motivated the armed 2016 incident as unfounded, and established fact-checkers found no evidence for the alleged ring.
Washington / United States · approximate request location
Likely FalseMemphis / United States
The claim says Elvis Presley did not die in 1977 and is alive, working at a McDonald’s in Tucson.
About
Public figure · Elvis Aaron Presley
Attribution
Urban Myth — unattributed visitor claim
Assessment
This Urban Myth says Elvis Presley did not die in 1977 and now works at a McDonald’s in Tucson. Contemporaneous and institutional records state that Presley died at Graceland in Memphis on August 16, 1977, including a presidential statement issued the following day, Graceland’s record and AP’s historical reporting. No reliable evidence supports the Tucson allegation. Those records make the claim overwhelmingly unlikely, while the inherently secret-survival premise cannot be disproved in every imaginable detail.
Memphis / United States · approximate request location
Likely FalseRoswell / United States
The Roswell incident involved an alleged alien landing in 1947 and a U.S. government cover-up.
About
Public event · The Roswell Incident
Attribution
Conspiracy Theory — unattributed visitor claim concerning the Roswell alien-recovery and government-cover-up narrative.
Assessment
This Urban Myth says aliens landed at Roswell in 1947 and the U.S. government covered it up. The available official record strongly weighs against that account: the National Archives describes extraterrestrial recovery as an allegation by pro-UFO researchers, while the government record describes balloon-related debris rather than an alien craft. Because some relevant records are missing or were destroyed, the surviving record cannot conclusively eliminate every claimed cover-up scenario; that prevents a definitive False verdict.
Roswell / United States · approximate request location
FalseGlobal / Global
The claim states that global warming is a hoax and that there is no evidence human actions have made today's climate hotter or warmer.
About
Public event · Global Warming
Attribution
Conspiracy Theory — unattributed visitor claim alleging that human-caused global warming is a coordinated hoax.
Assessment
This Urban Myth claims there is no evidence that human actions have made today’s climate warmer. Multiple independent lines of observational, paleoclimate, physical and attribution evidence directly contradict that claim. The IPCC reports that human activities, principally greenhouse-gas emissions, have unequivocally caused global warming, with global surface temperature in 2011–2020 about 1.1°C above 1850–1900. NOAA likewise documents the evidence linking recent warming to human activity.
These submissions passed automated publication-safety screening. Their wording is deliberately blurred until an editor verifies the subject, attribution, and evidence.
No pending visitor claims
Safety-cleared submissions will appear here immediately while evidence review is underway.
